-Sure there's differences between artists, but it's the same basic style for the most part. Take American animation for example. Not all our stuff is that great, but we do have a huge variety of art styles.Nope, I wish it had more variety in the art style too. I'm also tired of anime being stereotyped as only having huge gigantic eyes and anorexic unshapely bodies, because some anime that are not mainstream don't fit that stereotype. But I see what you're saying because I've been watching anime for years.but the style of anime is very,VERY beautiful! i love how anime and manga are drawn! yes,you know when it's anime and when it's not. but still i like it better the way it is know. anime beat US cartoons in everything: art,animation,story,soundtrack,ect.
i love how anime are drawn and wouldn't like it any other way!
I disagree with that, Japanese anime's has sa variety of genres if that's what u are talking about. if u are looking for some visual art style on anime , try to watch Elfen Lied or Gankutsuou: The Count of Monte Cristo. American anime are always 1 sided stories, but japanese anime are mostly interesting because you cannot predict the end.
This is why so many anime lovers do not like it when someone calls anime, cartoons.. because it is more realistic. It is not like I'd take my children and sit them in front of Elfen Leid. Cartoons are usually for kids. That being said. There is a ton of variety in anime. Its not like Betty Boop to Bugs Bunny Different, but that is their style of art in Japan. In japan they have mostly anime on TV. Very few Real life movies or shows are made. Plus I was told by a Japanese friend that they have to take art as a main class. Like we'd take English or Math. So they are being taught a certain cultural style. =)
Examples:
1) Paradise Kiss - http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclop鈥?/a>
2) CLAMP - http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclop鈥?/a>
* X/1999 - http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclop鈥?/a>
3) Miyazaki/Ghibli - http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclop鈥?/a>
* Princess Mononoke - http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclop鈥?/a>
that lack in variety of syle is whats important about anime, that way you can relate different anime to each other giving us the thought of anime having a unique world of its own, where different anime take place in different parts of that world.
so to me if every anime had had a different art style it would all end up in jumbled mess, meaning it wouldnt be as interesting
i like anime art better than recent american cartoon artistry. with that said i can see where your coming from. and the really good american artistry is actually in the comic books. i swear, some comic book illustrations look so realistic. though, i think anime artists try to have that certain style that makes it noticeably anime. besides the characters though, sometimes the backdrops can vary quite a bit. for example, 5 cm per second had an incredibly beautiful backdrop (though i thought the anime itself was lacking in substance).
It's true that there isn't much variety(although there are some that don't follow the same pattern and I, for example, authors by the art of their animes) but I think that this "basic style" is more beautiful than the American animation.
its called anime for a reason
I'm fine with it.
yes i agree with u
没有评论:
发表评论